The term multiculturalism is
widely used, but what does it mean? Rattansi
(2011, p. 138) writes about multiculturalism that is «describes a
response to society that is sensitive to diversity and difference without
forgetting the sameness that ties people together as human beings». A
multicultural classroom not only includes pupils with diverse cultural
backgrounds, but acknowledges and promotes differences, working to increase
knowledge and acceptance for other cultures.
In todays’ globalized world, most classrooms will show a lot of
diversity when it comes to pupils’ cultural background. Therefore, it is
increasingly important for teachers today to familiarise pupils with a variety
of different cultures, so that we can create an open and including society. When
a culture or accent is unfamiliar to the students, they may be prone to have a
negative attitude towards it. The road to decrease stereotypes and racism is
through knowledge and learning about different cultures. Therefore, I think it
is important to teach students about different cultures, and integrate elements
from them in the English lessons.
Learning about different
English speaking countries
Many textbooks have a section where you can learn about an English
speaking country. This is a great way to
integrate cultural knowledge with learning English. The countries that are
included are usually the EFL-countries (English as a Foreign Language), mainly
England and the US and perhaps countries like Australia and Canada. To explore
a broader view of culture in the English classroom, the teacher will usually
need to go beyond the textbooks.
Using literature, films and
music
A great way to learn about other cultures is to experience it through
art. When choosing literature, films and pieces of music, the teacher must be
very aware of his or her choices. If one has a goal of expanding the pupils’
knowledge, choosing works that challenge their misconceptions would be
preferable. It is important to set aside time before and after to find out
previous views, and then discuss what might be right and what is based on
stereotypes and prejudice.
Using the pupils’ backgrounds
Most classrooms today include pupils from different cultural
backgrounds. This alone does not make the classroom multicultural. A
multicultural classroom explores its different cultures and tries to integrate
them as a natural part of the lessons. Give pupils the possibilities to talk
about their culture and work on a class environment where it is good to be
curious about other cultures, and where the pupils have a welcoming and open
mind towards others, regardless of background. Make sure to also focus on what
they have in common, whilst showing appreciation for those differences that are
brought to light, and not make the cultural exploring an “us-them”-exploration.
They usually have more in common than they think.
Communicating with pupils from
other countries
A great way to practice your language skills is to speak or write with
someone who only understands the language you are learning, and not your mother
tongue. The teacher can set up a communication link between the class and people
of the same age from other countries. If the class has a pupil with another
first language, there is a perfect opportunity for the pupils to practice
making themselves understood without using their first language to explain
things for which they do not have English words.
Varieties
of English
In Jenkins (2009), different categorizations of speakers of English
around the world today are presented. One of these categorizations divides
speakers of English into three main groups; ENL, ESL and EFL. The first group,
ENL, consists of those who speak English as a native language (English as a
Native Language). The second group, ESL is for the speakers of English as a
second language. The third group is for those who speak English as a foreign
language. In addition to these three categories, there is another, ELF, for
those who use English as a lingua franca ‑ a bridge language, a language for
communication between people without a common language.
According to Jenkins (2009, p. 15) English as a native language (ENL) is
a term used for the someone who is born and raised in a country where
historically English is viewed as the first spoken language, meaning such
countries as the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand . English as a
second language refers to English spoken by those living in former British
colonies, such as India, Nigeria and Singapore (p. 16). English as a foreign
language (EFL) is the category for those who historically learned English to
speak with its native speakers, the ENL-speakers (p. 16). Today, Jenkins points
out; this is no longer their only goal in learning and speaking English. In EFL
areas, English has no official status, or purpose as Jenkins puts it. In
addition to English as a foreign language, there is another category, English
as a lingua franca, a building language. EFL and ELF is quite similar, but the
ELF-categorization puts focus on the intracultural use of English, the use of
English inside the boarders of the country. This can refer to the use of
English as an educational language or bridging language in other aspects of
society. According to Jenkins (2009, p. 16) it is difficult to assess which
group one should sort a speaker into in today’s globalized language situation,
if reasonable competence also should
be taken into account (p. 16).
Based on the description of the categorisations ENL, EDL, EFL and ELF
that are described in Jenkins (2009); Norwegian speakers of English could be
categorized as EFL-speakers, speakers of English as a foreign language or or
ELF-speakers, speakers of English as a lingua franca. Traditionally, I believe
Norwegian learners of English would learn English mainly to speak with native
speakers and as a way to communicate with people with different first
languages. This would make Norwegians EFL-speakers. In Norway today, for many
higher level students English is a necessary tool they must use to learn what
is expected of them. Medical students to mention one group, have mainly English
subject books. This is a natural effect of the dominance of English as a world
language, since most of the best academics write their papers in English, and
many subjects have terms that do not have a Norwegian translation. There is a
saying that if something has not been written in English, it has not happened,
meaning that to publish a paper of importance, one must also be able to publish
in English. This would make English a Lingua Franca in todays’ society.
Still, many Norwegian and Scandinavian people can be considered to be
far more native-like than those who live in countries that are also considered
EFL or ELF. This makes this categorization a little harder to find useful. One
would think that the closer to EFL, the better, but that is not necessarily the
case.
Based on this categorization of Norway as a ELF/ELF-nation, I would say
that educators should focus more on the global aspect of English than we do. We
should not only learn about the recognized ENL-countries, but also on the fact
that English opens up the world of communication to almost the whole of the
worlds’ population. Pupils should be exposed to many different varieties
Sources:
Jenkins, J. (2009): World Englishes: A Resource Book
for Students. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Rattansi, A. (2011) Multiculturalism: A Very Short
Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Great discussion about multiculturalism in the classroom and how we can help pupils develop open and positive attitudes towards cultural/linguistic diversity. The discussion about the status of English in Norway is a bit unclear, though, and it´s not clear what you mean by "the closer to EFL, the better". Do you mean speakers do achieve better competence in English when English is spoken more as a foreign language, and compared to which status? The discussion about how English should be taught based on your argument that English is spoken as a foreign language or lingua franca in Norway can also been elaborated little further. English has traditionally been taught as a foreign language so far, so there seems little coherence between your argument about the status of English in Norway and what this means in actual teaching practice if you regard English as a foreign language. Perhaps you would have wanted to give more arguments for English being used as a lingua franca in Norway and explain more about the differences between EFL and ELF to support your argument?
SvarSlett