fredag 11. mars 2016

A multicultural classroom and varieties of English



By: Ann Karoline Jessen
 
In this assignment, I am going to talk about how teachers can help create a multicultural classroom and then I am going to talk about different varieties of English in Norway.

Creating a multicultural classroom

“Multiculturalism advocates policies which seek to accommodate the different identities, values, and practices of both dominant and non-dominant cultural groups in culturally diverse society” (Murphy, 2012:6).

Communication is a key word when creating positive attitudes. Teaching about multiculturalism is not enough, the pupils have to talk about it, share their experience and knowledge while discussing the subject. From practice experience the use of different cultures that occur in a classroom is non-existent in everyday school life, it is not something that is brought up every day and it is not something that is continuously talked about in schools.
Another important aspect of creating a multicultural classroom is that the teacher has to be open-minded. The teacher has to be open for multiple cultures, have knowledge about different cultures, help create a classroom where expressing different cultures and teach pupils to be curious about culture and language. The teacher is the anchor in the classroom and sets the standards on behavior and openness.

However, in creating a multicultural or multilingual classroom you can meet a few challenges. For instance, we as teachers do not know what parents teach their children at home and what they talk about around the kitchen table. Because of this we do not know what attitudes the pupils brings from home. We do not know everything about the pupils or their parents. Sometimes parents have strong opinions on what their children learn in school; this can affect the pupils and their learning. Some parents do not want their children to learn about different cultures or languages around the world and this creates a difficult learning environment for the teacher. I think it is important for teachers to reach the parents as well as the pupils in situations like this, by either talking to the parents or involving the parents in the cultural education.

I have a few concrete examples of tasks that can be used in creating a multicultural class room. The first one is one that we used to do in my primary and secondary school. Every year we had an international day where all the different nations represented in our school had to show off their culture, which included food culture, clothing, and national songs and traditions. We had pupils from different parts of the world like Brazil, Peru, Italiy, Philippines, and more. Every nation was represented on different stands where they presented their food, clothes and culture to everyone walking around. This was a very educational experience for us where we learned about all the different cultures represented in our school.

My second example is similar to the first one; it’s about using the pupils and parents as resources. Use an hour every month or a half an hour every week to talk about different cultures, build a classroom and a classroom environment that is open for cultural expressions. The pupils can use the information they get to do different tasks like writing a letter to a foreign country, create a roll play where they portray characters in different cultures, make wallpapers, or create a collective fictional story where they use the information and facts they have about a culture or a country as inspiration.
My third example is creating a character. This will work better if there are more than one teacher in the classroom. The teachers can create a fictional character from a different culture or country and build a story about the character. This task will help the pupils relate to the character and will hopefully create enthusiasm around learning about different cultures around the world.

Varieties of English

Jenkins (2009) writes about four different categories of English, a native language (ENL), a second language (ESL), a foreign language (EFL), and lingua franca (ELF). A native language is the main language in a country, the language those who are born and raised in the country are learned. A second language is a language that a large number of speakers speak in a country i.e. in Nigeria that was colonized by Britain English is a second language. A foreign language is the language that is not needed in a country and doesn’t serve a purpose in the country i.e. in Norway English is categorized as a foreign language because it does not serve a purpose to the Norwegian citizens. The last category is lingua franca, it is described as a bridge language. It is a language that two people with different native languages share, i.e. a Norwegian student and a French student that does not speak each other’s native languages could use English as their lingua franca, their shared language (Jenkins, 2009:15-16).

In Norway, English is categorized a foreign language in Norway. It is a language that we are taught in school, a language we are taught to communicate with native speakers. In theory Norwegian learners of English belongs to the foreign language category, but in my opinion Norwegian learners does not belong there.

I would consider English as a lingua franca in Norway. Jenkins (2009) writes that Scandinavian countries use English more and more for a country internal purpose rather than a foreign or international language purpose (Jenkins, 2009:16). As time passes, more immigrants and refugees arrive in Norway and English must be used as a bridge language. We use English to build bridges country internal and international. We also use English to communicate with fellow citizens in everyday situations, i.e. in stores we can meet cashiers that does not speak Norwegian, so we have to use English to understand each other. We also use English in the Norwegian academic world by using both online international sources and international research. In Norway, we do not dub our television series or movies, which makes English an important language in Norway. We have a wide choice in books and music from around the world and most of the online services and social media is based on their users knowing English. All of these small things are reasons why English is so important for 
Norway and Norwegians to stay connected to the world.

As I stated previously, English is categorized a foreign language in Norway. I would say that considering how English is categorized in Norway that it has a lower status. However, with the way  English is taught in school I don’t think it has a very low status because it classifies as its own subject. I do not think that the status should affect the way English is taught in schools because it is a subject that is taught continuously throughout primary school, secondary school and high school. With the way, the world is evolving and the Norwegian country is expanding by taking in more and more refugees, the English language is used more and more in everyday life as a lingua franca. For this reason, I think that unless the changes in English language teaching increases the learning of English in Norwegian schools, there is nothing to change.

However, I do want to see is that pupils get a better understanding for why they have to learn English, why it is important that they learn English in school, and that they see the purpose of English in their everyday life.

Sources:

Jenkins, J. (2009): World Englishes: A resource book for students. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.

Murphy, M. (2012) In defense of multiculturalism. In Multiculturalism A critical Introduction. Canada: Routledge Tylor and Francis Group.

Varieties of English and a multicultural classroom

By: Mariell Bergh Sæbø

In this assignment, I am going to talk about a multicultural classroom and different varieties of English.


Multicultural English:
There are many different definitions of what multiculturalism is. One of them is a definition developed by Murphy (2012:6). In the terms of policies, Murphy defines multiculturalism as a term where both minorities’ and majorities’ cultural backgrounds, values and identities are accommodated.

Based on Murphy’s definition of the term multiculturalism, I want to focus on how we can create a multicultural classroom where the pupils have a positive attitude towards different cultures. I believe we can help the pupils in a way where we talk about what multiculturalism is and let the pupils discuss the topic. The teacher need to be open towards different cultures, have knowledge about them and be able to create a safe environment for the pupils. I believe that the pupils should be able to express their beliefs and be able to ask any questions they might have. In other words, the teacher need to increase awareness and knowledge about different ethnic groups.

There has been a long tradition of a monocultural community in Norway, which has slowed down the process of becoming a more multicultural community when we, in reality, are welcoming more and more cultures into our country. We want everyone to have the same opportunity at succeeding in Norway by welcoming multiculturalism into our classrooms. When trying to create a friendly multicultural classroom, difficult situations may occur. For example, the teacher may not know what the pupils are learning from their parents at home and the parents may contradict class lessons. Their parents could be telling them other cultural discourses than the teacher has in class. The parents may teach their children a different perspective than the teacher does. Therefore, the pupils might get confused and ignorant. For instance, a pupil might refuse to listen to the teacher’s lessons about multiculturalism and leave the classroom, or express false and ignorant perspectives. This might lead to a chain reaction where other pupils follows and it creates a bad trend in the classroom.

There are many ways of implementing multiculturalism into the class lessons. For example, I have completed an entrepreneurship in a 5th grade classroom. In this project they played different roles in a family that were going to travel or move to another country. During the project, they had to learn about their destination’s rules, culture and religion. In addition, one assignment was to figure out how to communicate with the native people of their destination. There was a clear focus of multiculturalism in my project, which led to a great learning outcome. It is also possible to learn about other countries in English. For instance, pupils can learn about the culture in Syria at school, and by doing this be prepared for when they might get a new classmate from Syria. Another activity for creating a multicultural classroom is having “a multicultural day”. This is an entire day at school making different types of food from the school’s or local community’s represented countries or cultures, as well as creating crafts and watch a movie or a lecture about the respective countries or cultures. This day is a practical approach to multiculturalism, but it is possible to make it more theoretical by discussing aspects about the respective countries or cultures. This is an activity created by Lars Aunaas (n.d.).


Varieties of English:
There are four different categories of English users: native language, second language, foreign language and lingua franca. I will give a short explanation of these different users and which category Norway is in.

English as a native language (ENL) means that it is used as the primary language in a country. For instance, English is used as a native language in England, America and Canada. When English is used as a second language, (ESL) the people in a specific country has another native language and learn English after they have learned their native language. This could be countries like India, Singapore and Jamaica. A foreign language (EFL) is a language you learn at school. For it to be called a foreign language it needs to be used intranational, which means that it is used for speaking to refugees, among other things. A lingua franca (ELF) is called a bridge language, which is a common language two interacting people communicate with. It is used to systematically make it possible for people from different countries to communicate with each other (Jenkins, J. 2009: 15-17).

In Norway, I believe English is used as a foreign language. I base this statement on two different reasons. One reason is that we start systematically learning English when we are six years old at school. We already speak our native language and accordingly, we learn English mostly to get cultural insight and to be a part of an international culture outside of Norway. The second reason is that we use it to communicate with people who move here from other countries. Then, we will be able to communicate with other nations inside of Norway as well as outside. ­­I would say that we are also using English as a lingua franca. As mentioned, we are learning English at school so that we can communicate with and learn from our new citizens, but many Norwegians are also learning English from birth. Either because they are a part of a multicultural family or because they have parents that wants their children to be able to communicate on an international level. In Norway, we now understand the need to know English more than previously because so many new citizens do not know our language and many Norwegian strives for a personal or work related international expansion. Jenkins (2009:16) explains this phenomenon like this: “…Scandinavian countries where English is increasingly being used for intranational purposes rather than purely as a foreign or international language.”

We teach English as if it is a foreign language, and I believe it is working quite well. We learn English all through primary school, middle school and high school and we are able to communicate and make ourselves understood by non-Norwegians. However, if we look at how the world is changing and evolving, we need to make sure that we follow the trend that English is used as a native language many places so that we can evolve with the world as well. I believe it would be positive to look at English as a second language. We should start learning it even earlier than first grade, at age six. In addition, we should make sure that pupils get a better understanding on why they need to learn English so that they know why it is so important. By doing this, the pupils might get more eager to learn English, and use it more often.

Sources:

Aunaas, L. (n.d.). Multicultural Societies in a Historic Perspective. From http://ndla.no/en/node/89615 Read: 09.03.16

Jenkins, J. (2009). World Englishes: A resource book for students. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Murphy, M. (2012). In defense of multiculturalism. In Multiculturalism A critical Introduction. Canada: Routledge Tylor and Francis Group.


fredag 29. januar 2016

Pronunciation

I believe there can be some difficulties in teaching pronunciation to pupils in primary school, but it’s only based on my own experience as a pupil. There was not any emphasis on correct pronunciation during my years in primary school. The emphasis was mainly on spelling and glossary tests. I learned most of my pronunciation watching television, movies, listening and speaking. In my mind, I always thought pronunciation is something that takes a lot time to develop. My assumption about teaching pronunciation is that it takes a lot of practice to learn to pronounce words correct, simply because there is a lot of words and many pronunciation “traps”.

It wouldn’t be far from the truth when I say that I never have seen the different symbols in the phonemic symbols, of course they have been in the glossary’s, but I never knew the correct sounds for the phonemes. I would usually guess the right pronunciation. I guess knowing the difference phonemes and allophones would make it easier to open a glossary and learn the correct spelling of the word almost instantly. There is just the challenge of teaching the pupils the system, a system that is almost a new alphabet.

When teaching pronunciation I would always start close to the pronunciation they already have. Growing up in Norway my experience tells me that American English is the accents I heard the most through television. When it comes to pronunciation, I don’t think it’s important if the students have a perfect American or English accent, but that they speak fluently and make themselves understood. I always think there will be different variations of accents in the group of pupils. Some students may have been on vacations or have relatives in English speaking countries, and that will influence their accents. I don’t think that it’s possible or advantageously to micromanage the pupils accents, because it might make the pupils lose some of their motivation if they already have an accent or they are struggling. The main emphasis pronunciation vise is to make them not sound like Petter Solberg

søndag 24. januar 2016

Pronunciation teaching and learning



by Sandra Mikalsen
 
For this assignment, I will answer to given questions about my thoughts on teaching and learning pronunciation.
First of all, do I think pronunciation is difficult to teach and learn? If so, why?
I believe that learning how to properly pronounce the words in a new language can be difficult for anyone. It requires a new way of maneuvering and adjusting our muscles in the speech organ, but also a mental readjustment over to the new language. For younger learners I think this can be especially challenging because of their underdeveloped brain and mental abilities, whilst learning and speaking a new language requires multiple tasks and processes in the brain at the same time. I also think it can be quite a challenge to teach someone else how to pronounce English words, especially if one self is insecure about his or hers pronunciation skills. It can also be more difficult to teach others if one do not know how to explain what parts of the speech organ to use to get the right sound of a word. Thus I can imagine it will be a challenge to both learn and teach someone the pronunciation of a new language.
So, what model of pronunciation would I use in teaching pronunciation, and why?
I have not yet made up my mind about whether to use American English or British English pronunciation in my teaching, even though I mostly use an American accent when I do speak English. I find it difficult to choose between those two because there are arguments for each one. My arguments for using American pronunciation is that I believe it has become the most common spoken form of English now a days mainly because of (and through) social media and television. Therefore I think both many young and older children are more exposed to American pronunciation because of the increasing use of it in cartoons, tv-shows and social media. Also I believe it is easier for Norwegian children to pronounce this form because, as I find it at least, the tone in both American and Norwegian speech are quite similar. My arguments for using British English is not as extensive though. As I learned English pronunciation during my school years I found it easier to remember both how to spell the English words and how to pronounce it after listening to a British person speaking. Also, I would argue that the British English has less and smaller variations in their accent, contrary to the American English where the variations throughout their country are greater. Thus it can be an advantage to use British English pronunciation.

Pronunciation for L2 learners


By Eirin Jensen

In this blog entry I will share my thoughts on learning and teaching pronunciation, and share my thoughts on which model of pronunciation I will use in teaching.

I never attended kindergarten, therefore I had a lot of time at home watching television and we had endless channels to choose from. At that time, there were no Norwegian channels for children, and I often ended up watching foreign cartoons. This is where my fascination for other languages began. I tried to imitate the words, the accents and intonation, although I did not understand much. I remember I was flabbergasted when I experienced that the English words were not written exactly like they were pronounced, because it made no sense to me. This I believe is one of the main reasons for why pronunciation is difficult to learn, especially for young Norwegians.

In Norwegian the words are pronounced almost exactly like they are written, something we call phonemic orthography (lydrett). Counting phonemes (sounds) in words is something the pupils learn in the first two years in school, and they also learn where the sounds are articulated. In English there are sounds that we do not use in Norwegian, which is a factor for why learning English pronunciation is difficult. I remember that I struggled with pronouncing some vowels, -th, and to separate s/z and v/w, which is typical difficulty for Norwegians learning English.

What might make teaching pronunciation difficult is the fact that it is the children themselves that have to produce the sound, and they need specific guidance of how to do so. As a teacher it is important to convey the importance of correct pronunciation, and to teach individual sounds and to work with sounds in a larger context. By increasing the awareness of the differences and similarities between L1 and L2 can attribute the learning process because the pupils can learn the sound patterns better. 

I have still not made a choice of which model of pronunciation I will use in teaching, but I have used British (RP) in my practice periods. I am a bit biased, as I myself prefer RP, but I know from experience that pupils speak an American English (AE) variant. Maybe not because it is a conscious choice, but because the Norwegian pronunciation affects the pronunciation of English which sounds more American than British.

The key element in teaching pronunciation is consistency in use of either RP or AE, but I would also give examples of what may differ between RP and AE. Although most of the English textbooks are in RP, I believe the biggest influence of language is from the media, which is dominated by AE. I need to use a model I am comfortable with, as this will affect my teaching confidence, which is why I probably will use RP.




Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonemic_orthography

Pictures: 
http://s3.thingpic.com/images/Gm/JWFKk8z1tnoyNey2m8cLqNCP.jpeg
http://www.top-ten.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Cartoon-Network-Original-LOGO.png
http://americanenglishuniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/british-english-vs-american-english.jpg
http://sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/i/keep-calm-and-speak-british-english.png